Appendix 1 – Proposals where objections are proposed to be upheld

 

1.            Site 1 Bourne Street, Ceylon Place, Pevensey Road (Councillor Stephen Holt)

1.1         The proposal at this location is to implement a new permit zone C in Bourne Street, Ceylon Place and Pevensey Road, install new no waiting at any time restrictions as required to protect access, and change existing zone S permit holders or time limited parking in Ceylon Place to zone C permit holders only.

1.2         Eight objections have been received, five on the grounds that the proposed new zone is too small and that the proposed changes will not ease parking difficulties. Two objections are on the grounds that the residents do not want to pay for permits and one objection is on the grounds that no loading bay was proposed to cater for a hotel on Pevensey Road. Three items of support were received for this proposal.

1.3         The proposal follows reports of difficulty parking in the existing permit zones and surrounding streets.

1.4         Having considered all the objections, officers are satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to withdraw the proposal. Residents wanting access protection can apply for an Access Protection Marking (APM) where a dropped kerb is present.

1.5         At the time of writing, Councillor Holt has not replied to provide their views regarding the recommendation.

1.6         Recommendation: To uphold the objections and withdraw the proposal

 

2.            Site 2 Colonnade Gardens, Colonnade Road, Marine Parade, Marine Parade Road, Queens Gardens, Seaside Road (Councillor Stephen Holt)

2.1         The proposal at this location is to implement a new permit zone C in Colonnade Gardens, Colonnade Road, Marine Parade, Marine Parade Road, Queens Gardens, and Seaside Road, moving these streets from the existing zone S, and to add the new zone to some pay and display or permit holders (H) bays in Marine Parade Road and Marine Parade.

2.2         Eleven objections have been received, all on the grounds that the proposed new zone is too small and that the proposed changes will not ease parking difficulties. No items of support were received for this proposal.

2.3         The proposal follows reports of difficulty parking in the existing permit zones and surrounding streets.

2.4         Having considered all the objections, officers are satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to withdraw the proposal.

2.5         At the time of writing, Councillor Holt has not replied to provide their views regarding the recommendation.

2.6         Recommendation: To uphold the objections and withdraw the proposal.